Tuesday, March 25, 2015
Dear Planning Commission,
Yesterday evening I
attended your meeting on the proposed new Central Park Master Plan. While I
made comments then, I wanted to write a brief letter to follow up, taking in
consideration the final comments of the Commission, which I watched from home
online.
Baseball Diamond and
Tennis Courts
Organized sports are an
important way for our citizens to get outside and stay healthy. We need more of
these features not less. The substitutions proposed at other parks are further
away from many neighborhoods. Given complaints in San Mateo about traffic, the need for more
people to drive within town should be discouraged. Also, generic athletic
fields are not the same as an actual ballpark. Scale down the bleachers, but
please keep the organized sports where they are currently situated.
Train
It is wonderful to have
a little train for the younger children, however making it a more dominant
feature seems overly ambitious. I am concerned about how this will impact
access to the children's playground, as well as safety, particularly in the
Community Center Option. Under this scenario a child playing in the 2-5 year
zone would be in an entirely different, fenced off area from a second child
playing in the 5-12 year zone. As people often have children of varying ages, this
distinct a separation between playgrounds is totally impractical and unsafe for
many families.
Parking
Please do not decrease
the existing parking, but spare our park the impact of any more. The cost for
additional parking seems way too expensive and invasive for the return on
investment. Despite the gripes we hear regularly about lack of parking, open space
is more scarce than spots to put a car.
Plaza
A large, cement feature does not enhance the
character of the park as a retreat from the urban space of downtown.
Comparisons to Redwood City
do not persuade me. The Plaza in Redwood
City is often rented to private events and corporate
parties. Should this come to pass in San Mateo, it would be a horrible set back
to the general public who would actually lose park space despite a stated
objective of gaining more.
Self Help for the
Elderly
There is a demonstrated
benefit to this organization. Should they be displaced from Central
Park , it would be to the benefit of the City to find suitable
accommodation for them in the downtown area.
Bathrooms
The one point of the new plans I have only praise for it is improving the
existing restroom as well as providing another option or two.
Finally, I very much agree with comments from Commissioner Massey
urging we respect the existing uses of the park. Please help it maintain its
historic character as well as its current user base. Do not alienate the
existing daily users by moving forward with unproven proposals which may not in
fact enhance the user experience for our citizens in the long run. As many said
last night, let’s not expend a great deal of City revenue ‘fixing’ a park which
is beloved as it is now.
Kind regards,