Wednesday, January 22, 2014

Public Comment to City Council on January 6, 2014 - Is the San Mateo Michael's TOD?

Dear San Mateo City Council,

The purpose of zoning is to direct local development such that it corresponds to the overall vision of how we want our city to look, feel and function. This grand concept is meant to transcend the needs and desires of individual businesses and residents in order to achieve greater value for the city as a whole.

There seems to be no doubts as to the fact Michael’s is a fine store which attracts a loyal group of shoppers from the immediate area. Please let me stress my objection to the planning application in question lies in the location of the proposed store, not Michael’s itself. Wholeheartedly, we should work to ensure Michael’s finds a compromise location in San Mateo. However, this end should not erode the principles set forth by our zoning and TOD plans, including the Rail Corridor and Hillsdale Station Plans.

Transit-oriented development, or TOD, represents a concerted effort to consider transportation efficiency as a foremost planning guideline.

In terms of TOD, what is so special about 2925 El Camino?

Quite simply, it is located within ¼ mile of Hillsdale Station, one of the most utilized stops on the Caltrain line. In addition, in the next decade or so when that station is moved north according to city plan, 2925 El Camino will be directly across from the station’s projected location. All of this gives plans concerning the site’s development regional importance, as well as making it deeply impactful on numerous San Mateo residents, many whom I expect are currently unaware of the long term ramifications of avoiding enforcement of the standards of TOD which have been laid down for us thus far. 2925 El Camino represents a rare chance to adopt TOD standards at a critical part of our transit corridor. We should not squander the opportunity to demand innovation at this site.

What is so important about TOD?

TOD is as important as the air we breathe.

On November 9 of last year, Congresswoman Jackie Speier hosted a presentation on the expected sea level rise facing San Mateo County. The projections for water level rise in the county are the most severe of any in the Bay Area. The projections presented at this conference also showed significant parts of San Mateo underwater in the next 50 years unless we alter our circumstances. The City of San Mateo needs to recognize its vulnerability in terms of climate change and act accordingly. Because it is devised to reduce toxic transportation emissions which are a prime contributor to climate change locally, TOD planning is a key way we can responsibly move forward.

What are the fundamentals of a vital TOD program?

One core value of TOD is mixing residential and commercial uses in high densities around significant transit centers. The Michael’s development under consideration contains neither a residential nor a commercial component. At one story and the usable space occupying only a tiny footprint of the property and surrounded by a vast parking lot, Michael’s also does not fit the definition of high density.
Another core value of TOD, which is called for in Policy 5.1, San Mateo’s vision of sustainable, economically vital development around Hillsdale station, is projects enhancing or revitalizing of some other, less transit supportive uses. For this reason, large, single use retail stores are not considered in alignment with TOD zoning. The new Michael’s, while ever so marginally better than the old Borders insomuch as it adds a small, freestanding cafĂ© and bedroom sized community center, is still not a substantial refashioning of the existing property. Keeping the same floor plan but modifying the entrances hardly fulfills the lofty goals set out in San Mateo’s planning literature over the last decade. I implore the Council not to accept such paltry compliance to our outlined values and principles.

Status quo, which is what repurposing the existing Borders store essentially amounts to, is the easiest path. However, it is my opinion it is certainly not the best choice for the long term interest of the San Mateo residents, regional transit solutions as a whole or the legacy of this City Council.