Public Comment to the Planning Commission on Hillsdale Terrace, PA13-077

Dear Planning Commission and project manager Schimpp,

I am writing in regard to an upcoming planning application, PA 13-077, which will be discussed at the meeting of the planning commission next Tuesday, February 25, 2014. Based on the information presented by the developer at the January 29, 2014 community meeting, I hope for a positive response from the commission and project manager.

Hillsdale Terrace is the sort of mixed use development envisioned and encouraged under the various Transit Oriented Development (TOD) zoning requirements covering the location in question. There is a need for housing in San Mateo and locating a complex of this size close to Hillsadale Caltrain fulfills the mission of TOD by allowing residents to avoid a vehicle commute if they travel by rail. In addition, concentrating density on a main artery such as El Camino should help mitigate increases of traffic in our suburban neighborhoods, thus helping to preserve the small town feel San Mateans have long enjoyed.

The group assembled in January had a small concentration of people who are concerned about the impact the building may have on parking in the local vicinity. It is not atypical for existing residents to fear encroachment by new developments, and parking concerns should be addressed insomuch as possible without scaling down the proposed density. The developers are not asking for exceptions for what is outlined in the zoning.

Another complaint voiced during the neighborhood session was that residents would have to drive to the grocery store as there is not one a walkable distance away. At 0.7 miles away, Trader Joe’s may be further than most would want to walk to the grocery store, but it is still within reason for others, especially as they may be running errands in the mall on the way. In addition, most people do not drive to the grocery store daily. It is also worth noting, Hillsdale Terrace is less than 0.5 mile from the Hillsdale Food Court, making a variety of food choices available within a very short walk. Finally, as there is retail on the ground floor it is possible some food choices will be available on the immediate premises.

To summarize, the lots in question under PA13-077 are currently unproductive and bring no significant benefit to the city. The proposed alternative, a 55ft. development mixing retail and residential uses, is in keeping with the TOD zoning governing the area and should be supported.